W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

RE: Framing the proxy discussion

From: <K.Morgan@iaea.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:10:21 +0000
To: <mnot@mnot.net>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0356EBBE092D394F9291DA01E8D28EC201186DF0FB@sem002pd.sg.iaea.org>
On Monday,23 June 2014 10:21, mnot@mnot.net<mailto:mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Also, a gentle reminder - we make decisions based upon technical arguments

> ("rough consensus and running code"), not voting. So repeating an argument

> or "+1-ing" it only adds to noise, it doesn't help your case. Please have a read

> of <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-resnick-on-consensus> if this is new to you.

That link seems to be broken.  Here's a link to the latest draft I could find [1]. Reading it again was a good reminder for me of the IETF process.

>From Section 6 of [1]: "... you can have rough consensus with issues that have been purposely dismissed, but not ones that have been ignored. ... Even if no particular person is still standing up for an issue, that doesn't mean an issue can be ignored."

What should you do if you feel like a particular issue is being ignored on the mailing list?  Open an issue in the issue tracker?

[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-resnick-on-consensus-07

This email message is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Information contained in this email message and its attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others. Also please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system.
Received on Monday, 23 June 2014 11:10:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC