- From: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 02:08:46 +0200
- To: "Eric J. Bowman" <eric@bisonsystems.net>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 01:50:55 +0200, Eric J. Bowman <eric@bisonsystems.net> wrote: > "Martin Nilsson" wrote: >> >> And we can know if the request is coming from XHR. We can also know >> if the resource is inspected, saved, etc. since it is our UA code. >> > > And intermediaries? How are they to know any of this, since it isn't > *their* UA code? > >> >> The response code doesn't have any semantic value here though, since >> the UA already knows that the resource is transformed. >> > > Maybe not to you, but without those semantics, how can intermediaries > participate in the communication? That's where the semantic value comes > in -- even if it isn't relevant to you, interoperability is relevant to > the other components you don't have control over, is the point here. > The protocol is not designed to interop. The latest version released is a SPDY derived protocol not running on port 80. We plan to start encrypting it soon, if we aren't already in the latest release. /Martin Nilsson -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Sunday, 22 June 2014 00:09:17 UTC