- From: <K.Morgan@iaea.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 15:52:19 +0000
- To: <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- CC: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 18 June 2014 12:29, phk@phk.freebsd.dk wrote: > > I'm starting to really hate the entire HEADER+CONTINUATION kludge > upon kludge upon kludge hackery. > Me too. > ... > If the WG insist on supporting ridiculously large HTTP headers, we > should eat one of the reserved bits in the frame header to indicate > the precense of a length-extension-field is present in front of the > payload, so that all headers can be fit into one single frame that way. This is a great idea. Get rid of CONTINUATION please. This email message is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Information contained in this email message and its attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others. Also please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system.
Received on Saturday, 21 June 2014 15:56:33 UTC