- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 05:43:09 +0000
- To: "Martin Nilsson" <nilsson@opera.com>
- cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
In message <op.xhrq48whiw9drz@beryllium.oslo.osa>, "Martin Nilsson" writes: >On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 21:28:43 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> >wrote: > >> In message >> <CABkgnnUonH0=ws=ofbdQK_R6Kj6CAWS1Rz2MrsiVDK=D_AhzVg@mail.gmail.com> >> , Martin Thomson writes: >>> On 19 June 2014 11:20, Richard Wheeldon (rwheeldo) <rwheeldo@cisco.com> >>> wrote: >> >>> It might just come down to detecting and whitelisting proxies so that >>> they get more connections or more concurrent streams. >> >> You're kidding about whitelisting, right ? > >You need to whitelist (or buy IP numbers) already today, so it's not an >HTTP/2 problem. Could you point me to the place in the HTTP/1.1 RFC that says that proxies must be whitelisted ? I must have missed it on my first N*100 readings... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 21 June 2014 05:43:41 UTC