Re: intermediaries, implicit gzip, etags, no-transform

On 2014-06-20 19:04, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 20 June 2014 08:12, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> - setting "cache-control: no-transform" on the response, does not change
>> this behavior, thus both seem to violate a "MUST NOT" requirement from
>> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc7230.html#rfc.section.5.7.2>
>
> Good thing for them that there are no protocol police.

Nobody expects the protocol police.

Received on Friday, 20 June 2014 18:44:43 UTC