- From: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:47:05 +0200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2014 17:47:47 UTC
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:50:56 +0200, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > > To avoid this table churn, jetty does not use the static entries for > things like :status:404, and instead send them as a non indexed literal > with indexed >name and huffman value. We only put 200 and 304 in the > table as we think they are the only ones for which repeat occurrences > are likely, and thus >the table churn is not totally wasted effort. Having error codes in the table was probably a mistake. Why would you need to fail efficiently? /Martin Nilsson -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2014 17:47:47 UTC