W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014


From: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 19:47:05 +0200
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.xhpqcrx8iw9drz@uranium.aas.attingo.nl>
On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:50:56 +0200, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:

> To avoid this table churn, jetty does not use the static entries for  
> things like :status:404, and instead send them as a non indexed literal  
> with indexed >name and huffman value.  We only put 200 and 304 in the  
> table as we think they are the only ones for which repeat occurrences  
> are likely, and thus >the table churn is not totally wasted effort.

Having error codes in the table was probably a mistake. Why would you need  
to fail efficiently?

/Martin Nilsson

Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2014 17:47:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC