W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Trusted proxy UI strawman

From: Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:22:44 +0000
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <A4BAAB326B17CE40B45830B745F70F1061E3890A@VOEXM17W.internal.vodafone.com>
> I do agree having the right terminology helps  

>  the Explicit Authenticated Proxy (as proposed in the draft) is supposed to do a really narrow and limited job
>  that is to proxy http:// URI traffic transported over TLS

For the other HTTP traffic types: The behaviour for https:// is stated in section 1.1, but what is the expected behaviour of the Explicit Authenticated Proxy for http:// URIs over HTTP/2 but not TLS? The answer may also affect section 4.2 which talks about http:// over HTTP/1.1.

Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2014 11:23:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC