- From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 11:18:30 -0700
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Jun 13, 2014, at 10:06 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 June 2014 13:28, Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> wrote: >> perhaps we can take the opportunity to spend some time during the IETF in Toronto Yes, please. > Perhaps we can spend some time discussing the topic on the list > beforehand. Yes. > That would help me a great deal in determining what - if > anything - needs discussion at a face-to-face meeting. > > The big hole in this discussion is the user consent question. I find > the answers presented thus far unsatisfactory. Is there some new > information that can be shared in this regard? Or, are there new > technical proposals that don't suffer from a dependency on users > making correct decisions? Yes for example see Peter Lepeska's post today, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2014AprJun/1281.html. I think it could be implemented with a certificate that explained it is a proxy (in the certificate capabilities) without necessarily needing draft-mcgrew-tls-proxy-server by just seeing the presented certificate has capability=proxy. draft-mcgrew-tls-proxy-server does provide some additional value. -d
Received on Sunday, 15 June 2014 18:19:03 UTC