Re: what about Proxies in Toronto?

Add another +1 from me.

On 6/13/14, 12:50 PM, Diego R. Lopez wrote:
> I definitely support the idea!
>
> On 13 Jun 2014, at 17:04 , DRUTA, DAN <dd5826@att.com
> <mailto:dd5826@att.com>> wrote:
>
>> I think we need to restart the discussions on intermediaries. With
>> most of the issues on HTTP/2 out of the way, this subject should not
>> have an impact on the HTTP/2 deliverables. As I understand this was a
>> concern earlier.
>> As I recall we agreed in London to start with Mark's proxy problem
>> draft
>> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-proxy-problem-00)
>> as an informational working group draft with Julian as an editor.
>> This would definitely be a good topic for Toronto as it is the first
>> step towards addressing the intermediaries' problem.
>> Best Regards,
>> Dan
>> *From:*willchan@google.com <mailto:willchan@google.com>
>> [mailto:willchan@google.com]*On Behalf Of*William Chan (???)
>> *Sent:*Friday, June 13, 2014 5:11 AM
>> *Cc:*ietf-http-wg@w3.org <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
>> *Subject:*Re: what about Proxies in Toronto?
>> I've already informed the folks at the interim, but I currently have
>> no plans to be in Toronto. Obviously, if you still want to meet to
>> discuss it, go for it :) I'm happy to provide feedback on proxy
>> related discussions at other points.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 3:25 AM, Smith, Kevin, (R&D) Vodafone Group
>> <Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com <mailto:Kevin.Smith@vodafone.com>> wrote:
>> Hi Salvatore,
>> +1 from me, and hopefully will be there in person.