Re: Reserved extension ids from Daniel Sommermann on 2014-06-13 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2014)

From: Daniel Sommermann <dcsommer@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 10:06:30 -0700
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <539B2F96.8090403@fb.com>

On 06/13/2014 09:53 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> Let me know if this is OK: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://http2.github.io/http2-spec/%23iana&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=IrwMSGpW3PFDVcAQTcJK0g%3D%3D%0A&m=9XG4svcqkl09wVxf4d8yR84zdCuTAyZ8OwnthxpJOLI%3D%0A&s=8f7f42a799f12fb39f7c5d77844c693ca7bef39ee93b058d05cfa23ffa7fe144
>
> This establishes IANA registries for frame types, settings and error
> codes.  They have different rules, but those rules follow your
> recommendation pretty closely.

I completely missed this section, thanks. Everything in there looks 
reasonable to me.

> I'll note however that future RFCs are not given special status over
> other documents, other than being a slightly easier way to get frame
> types, given the selected registration rules.

Makes sense.

Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 17:06:59 UTC