- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:15:04 -0700
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 12 June 2014 06:33, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Can people live with that or should we try to come up with something more > elegant? What you have is reasonable either way. Deconstructing the syntax further is OK too, though I always find the precedence order of commas and semi-colons to be completely unintuitive. > PS: maybe it's time to start using JSON in header field values. You first :) p.s., I think we agreed to lift the restriction on other host names and move that to -encryption. p.p.s., Do we want q= on these?
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2014 17:15:32 UTC