W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Values for Accept-Encoding

From: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 12:52:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+pLO_jeU5NNkOQ-vXdUW-tPyV8R9HP=6hGp_vLw+5JLTL+JeQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
+1


On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:

> yup
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com
> > wrote:
>
>> +1 -- this should be the norm.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net]
>> Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 11:19 AM
>> To: Martin Thomson
>> Cc: HTTP Working Group
>> Subject: Re: Values for Accept-Encoding
>>
>> +1 to the pull
>>
>> On 9 Jun 2014, at 2:00 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Nick submitted  https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/513
>> >
>> > I think that this makes sense.  Does anyone want to argue for other
>> values?
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Monday, 9 June 2014 19:52:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC