Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-ops-00.txt

I'm in favor of such a document. That said, I think that an internet-draft
is a poor way to do this. It gets out of date too quickly. I'd prefer using
our HTTP/2 github account for this. A wiki page there would be wonderful
IMO.


On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> FYI. This is really just a straw-man to start a discussion about whether
> we should adopt such a draft (not necessarily this particular one).
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-ops-00.txt
> > Date: 30 May 2014 5:29:43 pm AEST
> > To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
> >
> >
> > A new version of I-D, draft-nottingham-http2-ops-00.txt
> > has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the
> > IETF repository.
> >
> > Name:         draft-nottingham-http2-ops
> > Revision:     00
> > Title:                HTTP/2: Operational Considerations for Servers
> > Document date:        2014-05-30
> > Group:                Individual Submission
> > Pages:                6
> > URL:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-http2-ops-00.txt
> > Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-http2-ops/
> > Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http2-ops-00
> >
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This document gives advice regarding performance and operability to
> >   servers deploying HTTP/2.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > The IETF Secretariat
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>
>