W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: explicitly authenticated proxy: new draft

From: Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 01:46:41 +0200
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.xghqz3g0iw9drz@uranium.bredbandsbolaget.se>

On Mon, 26 May 2014 05:21:25 +0200, Richard Wheeldon (rwheeldo)  
<rwheeldo@cisco.com> wrote:

> It's a bit of a minor point, but I also find the use of "h2c" in a TLS  
> negotiation ugly. Assuming that the c in h2c implies clear text, using  
> it for an encrypted channel seems to be asking for confusion,

I was confused about that as well, but I guess the counter argument is  
that why would you use different identifiers for http-URL-originating  
http/2 traffic for different transports?

/Martin Nilsson

Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Monday, 26 May 2014 23:47:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC