W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Our Schedule

From: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 16:44:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CAH_y2NE22PeEDAsrqg3wnpX7Gyt-KmMrqmk8cw1Qq8=uHEyGAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Richard Wheeldon (rwheeldo)" <rwheeldo@cisco.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 26 May 2014 15:00, Richard Wheeldon (rwheeldo) <rwheeldo@cisco.com>wrote:

>  I’m curious as to what data you’re basing this on? I’m not saying you’re
> wrong – just looking for evidence. In particular data or results that I
> could use to sanity test our own implementations,

Nothing very objective I'm afraid.

You can see the kind of results we see with SPDY in our 2012 javaone
presentation:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ai_rrhM8gA

Don't  get me wrong, we certainly have application scenarios where our
throughput bottle neck is the size of HTTP headers.  Reducing HTTP header
size should be a priority of HTTP/2.  But I don't think we need to
sacrifice good protocol basics to achieve a world record in compression


Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.
Received on Monday, 26 May 2014 14:44:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC