- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 07:27:26 +0000
- To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <B5F8AB8E-6AE0-47A8-9563-471827297D9A@gmail.com>, Yoav Nir writes: >> Wouldn't it be faster to go straight after the real goal, an >> protocol which CAN replace HTTP/1.1 in all scenarios and be >> an improvement in ALL scenarios ? >I think that would be a fool's errand. >[...] >I don't believe a single protocol can be optimal in all scenarios. I wrote "improvement", not "optimal". -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 26 May 2014 07:27:49 UTC