- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 07:54:52 -0700
- To: "Richard Wheeldon (rwheeldo)" <rwheeldo@cisco.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
I think that Mike answered the first. And I'm reluctant to add more tabulation of what is basically a secondary piece of information. On 20 May 2014 04:27, Richard Wheeldon (rwheeldo) <rwheeldo@cisco.com> wrote: >> Yes, CONTINUATION is special and its intentional. > > OK. Then I'm definitely missing something. Is there a link that explains the intent? The basic idea is that header blocks can exceed the size of a single frame. But we need to ensure that they are processed as a single contiguous block because they modify/access the connection global header compression state. The was we have agreed to guarantee exclusive access to that state is to force header blocks to be contiguous.
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2014 14:55:20 UTC