Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http2-encryption-03.txt from Martin Thomson on 2014-05-20 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 05:40:47 -0700
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnULiNLOxxO-DMTQHfyR8gZ3VeQ2Pzzv8q7uJyDdxrjREQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 20 May 2014 01:31, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
> Would you be ok with s/opportunistic encryption/opportunistic
> security/? The latter is the term that the saag discussion has
> ended up landing on, (post bikeshed:-) so it'd be good if
> that worked here too.

Yeah, we're not looking to be revolutionary.

> I wonder if the MUST and MUST NOT terms in 5.1 are ok. But
> if they're there to find that out then that's fine:-)

The entirety of Section 5 is there to air those sorts of questions.

Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2014 12:41:19 UTC