- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 20:53:16 +1000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Johnny Graettinger <jgraettinger@chromium.org>, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, C.Brunhuber@iaea.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, K.Morgan@iaea.org
On 15 May 2014, at 11:48 am, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > I am down with Matthew's suggestion here to lift the MUST. Though I note that there are cases where this places an intermediary between a rock and a hard place in terms of conflicting requirements. Maybe we can note that an intermediary /could/ decompress and leave the normative text out of it. That makes sense to me… -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2014 10:53:53 UTC