W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Making Implicit C-E work.

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 20:53:16 +1000
Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Johnny Graettinger <jgraettinger@chromium.org>, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, C.Brunhuber@iaea.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, K.Morgan@iaea.org
Message-Id: <9ADFA60A-0E20-4585-AB76-E6CB4D665975@mnot.net>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>

On 15 May 2014, at 11:48 am, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am down with Matthew's suggestion here to lift the MUST. Though I note that there are cases where this places an intermediary between a rock and a hard place in terms of conflicting requirements. Maybe we can note that an intermediary /could/ decompress and leave the normative text out of it.

That makes sense to me…

Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2014 10:53:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC