- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 08:06:52 +0200
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi there. It just occurred to me that by switching to a non-textual message format, we lost a canonical way to represent messages in examples. I wouldn't be surprised it people start using "HTTP/2" as protocol name in messages using the 1.1 format. Is this a problem? Do we need to make a recommendation? Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 12 May 2014 06:07:21 UTC