W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Graceful shutdown #458

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 15:13:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUQ-ou4SQGouaBbji0sZCtobF9gqvPaUjn6zNMv_Fu9EQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 8 May 2014 15:01, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
> DRAINING differs from ALTSVC mostly in that it requires no state be kept.

True, equivalent to ALTSVC with ma=0, I guess.

> Otherwise, I believe ALTSVC can be used to drain things so long as it is
> worded such that an ALTSVC to the same location causes a new connection to
> be created.

I think that we'd definitely need that wording.  Would that work for you?
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2014 22:13:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC