- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 15:13:16 -0700
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 8 May 2014 15:01, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > DRAINING differs from ALTSVC mostly in that it requires no state be kept. True, equivalent to ALTSVC with ma=0, I guess. > Otherwise, I believe ALTSVC can be used to drain things so long as it is > worded such that an ALTSVC to the same location causes a new connection to > be created. I think that we'd definitely need that wording. Would that work for you?
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2014 22:13:44 UTC