W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: http/2 & hpack protocol review

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 12:50:13 +0000
To: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>
cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, "K.Morgan@iaea.org" <K.Morgan@iaea.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "C.Brunhuber@iaea.org" <C.Brunhuber@iaea.org>
Message-ID: <95223.1399380613@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CAH_hAJEcBtjxu=oyjiMRTCmFrQY7ZwOem9BauHsxFFSUZCHpCg@mail.gmail.com>
, Cory Benfield writes:

>I think that ship has sailed.
>Certainly, in the world of client side HTTP libraries we're expecting
>that HTTP/2 will not supplant HTTP/1.1. We're not even sure that
>HTTP/2 will become the default.

Or for that matter:  If HTTP/2 will be an improvement in the first place.

I've yet to see any numbers that justify technical cost of the added

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2014 12:50:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC