- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 20:36:13 -0700
- To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
- Cc: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>, Daniel Sommermann <dcsommer@fb.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2 May 2014 15:30, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote: > The way our code works right now is, on receipt of a GOAWAY, we put > ourselves in a lame duck mode and kill all streams above the last accepted > stream id with an error code to retry them. If we're already in the lame > duck mode, great. We don't track anything about previous accepted stream > ids. Perfect. No extra logic. If you get an extra GOAWAY, you might kill a few more requests. What does the extra explicitness of DRAINING actually buy?
Received on Saturday, 3 May 2014 03:36:41 UTC