- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 08:56:41 -0700
- To: K.Morgan@iaea.org
- Cc: John Graettinger <jgraettinger@chromium.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
On 25 April 2014 01:26, <K.Morgan@iaea.org> wrote: > A few thoughts follow, but most importantly, what are we supposed to > implement for the -12 implementation draft? (It quite clearly states that > compression is per frame.) That doesn't change. -12 is very clear on this. But it was fairly clear to me that this discussion wasn't over, so here we are. I'm perfectly happy to close the issue and call this done. Roberto raised some DoS concerns here as well (I'll point out that anyone concerned about this is free to not implement the feature, which is essentially free).
Received on Friday, 25 April 2014 15:57:09 UTC