Re: GOAWAY and proxies (#458) from Martin Thomson on 2014-04-21 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:49:39 -0700
To: Daniel Sommermann <dcsommer@fb.com>
Cc: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWECPJnhtSK7eYoP9MvuxdEtQmAPBAg8B4+7=Z8RkWb2Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 21 April 2014 16:26, Daniel Sommermann <dcsommer@fb.com> wrote:
> We are implementing the GOAWAY hack of acknowledging the last transaction id
> we saw plus MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS, but we don't use this for publicly
> facing connections since it is non-standard behavior.

2x MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS, I hope.

I'm still not clear on why this is insufficient.  Can you explain
further?  (Having text in the spec would still be worthwhile, if that
was where we ended up.)

Received on Monday, 21 April 2014 23:50:08 UTC