- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:22:17 -0700
- To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- Cc: Johnny Graettinger <jgraettinger@chromium.org>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>, K.Morgan@iaea.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 21 April 2014 14:56, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote: > Alternatively, and equally acceptable to me, would be to leave the 14-bit > length field and further restrict the HTTP layer to only use 2^14 - 9 bytes > (to allow for 8 bytes of padding). I think perhaps you need to speak a little more about why reframing doesn't work for you.
Received on Monday, 21 April 2014 22:22:49 UTC