Re: Transfer-codings, mandatory content-coding support and intermediaries

On Sun, 20 Apr 2014, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Daniel, any thoughts from a curl perspective here -- would you support a 
> "compressed data frame" flag?

I would expect that feature to be something machine API consumers might like, 
so yes I would imagine that I would work on implementing it.

curl is also one of those clients that has transfer-encoded gzip support for 
HTTP 1.1 so I figure it would match that...

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se

Received on Sunday, 20 April 2014 16:37:11 UTC