W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: END_SEGMENT and END_STREAM redundant

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:23:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNewqALJRfwB9nDtZd3Mf-cGn8TX2tnbnNQU+dV_JJvqyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Arguably these are not redundant, since the message may not have been
completed when the stream was terminated.
-=R
On Apr 19, 2014 8:08 AM, "Adrian Cole" <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, all.
>
> The combination of END_SEGMENT and END_STREAM seem redundant to me.
> It seems like you wouldn't need to support both flags at the same
> time, as ending a stream surely ends the segment.  Is it worthwhile
> calling this out?
>
> -A
>
>
Received on Saturday, 19 April 2014 22:24:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC