Re: Transfer-codings, mandatory content-coding support and intermediaries from Martin Thomson on 2014-04-19 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 18:56:17 -0700
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, C.Brunhuber@iaea.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, K.Morgan@iaea.org
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX4uo6X4AWE8m7Ub+JEHdmuR0X-1xBGnHGnDKnjN78UDg@mail.gmail.com>

On Apr 18, 2014 2:21 PM, "Matthew Kerwin" <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote:
> The obvious simplification, then, would be to change the setting to
"accept gzip (yes/no)" (or replace the setting with a MUST support), and
remove the encoding field from the Data frame.

I could live with that. A little more protocol machinery to reduce the
potential complexity of implementations.

Received on Saturday, 19 April 2014 01:56:45 UTC