W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Encoding Context Update

From: Kulkarni, Saurabh <sakulkar@akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 18:20:10 -0400
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CF75A1AA.553E%sakulkar@akamai.com>
Does a “Encoding Context Update” require a indexed representation with ‘0’ index and then a “001 <command>” or this is just an editorial mistake in not deleting this part of the spec.


This is the description for Indexed Representation:

An _indexed representation_ with an index value of 0 entails one of the following actions, depending on what is encoded next:
 o The reference set is emptied.
 o The maximum size of the header table is updated.

And this is description for Encoding context update:

An encoding context update causes the immediate application of a change to the encoding context.
 | 0 | 0 | 1 | F | ... |
 Context Update
 An encoding context update starts with the ’001’ 3-bit pattern.

But doesn’t really mention indexed representation. Based on the bits used, I am guessing the indexed representation was not updated? Please clarify, thanks.

- Saurabh
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 22:20:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC