W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Frame Length Restrictions

From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:24:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP+FsNdbL9RFjWyEzp1CBX5oeJJDRfVUL7HmSKr6ejAvtJNPzg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Makes sense to me.
-=R


On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote:

> I put together a pull request to replace the frame length restriction with
> an HTTP application layer restriction that I would like the working group
> to consider.
>
> https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/456
>
> Of particular note is that this is in contrast to a previous decision made
> by the working group (albeit by coin toss in Seattle) which can be found
>
> https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/260
>
> With the addition of padding to the framing layer, I believe it is
> preferable to implement the frame length requirement at the HTTP layer to
> allow intermediaries to pad frames without running into frame length
> restrictions.
>
> Thanks!
> - Jeff
>
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 01:24:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:30 UTC