- From: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 18:24:27 -0700
- To: Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 01:24:54 UTC
Makes sense to me. -=R On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com> wrote: > I put together a pull request to replace the frame length restriction with > an HTTP application layer restriction that I would like the working group > to consider. > > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/pull/456 > > Of particular note is that this is in contrast to a previous decision made > by the working group (albeit by coin toss in Seattle) which can be found > > https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/260 > > With the addition of padding to the framing layer, I believe it is > preferable to implement the frame length requirement at the HTTP layer to > allow intermediaries to pad frames without running into frame length > restrictions. > > Thanks! > - Jeff >
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2014 01:24:54 UTC