Re: END_SEGMENT and headers

A message might be comprised of HEADERS   DATA(200bytes)
HEADERS+CONTINUATION   DATA(20bytes)   HEADERS.

Your suggestion of making END_HEADERS mean END_SEGMENT would disallow
expression of such a message.


On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:18 PM, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com> wrote:

> What? This proposal does not disturb segmentation. Metadata may appear in
> the middle of a message, but not in the middle of the headers!
>
> On 2014–04–17, at 5:45 AM, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I misread that!
> >
> > I withdraw that this is a good improvement, since there are protocols
> that may want to have metadata in the middle of a message.
> >
> > -=R
>
>
>