Re: Porting T-E to HTTP/2: Reasons Against from Martin Thomson on 2014-04-11 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 12:11:35 -0700
To: Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVBK3HCn2QucL71EDF7Ecocai4o5cQApNLTq0cFbTOjnQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 11 April 2014 11:59, Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de> wrote:
> If this was always in then I problably misunderstood issue #424
> (https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/424) and the consensus call to
> it http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2014JanMar/1118.html.

#424 is about the client being able to compress request bodies (again
using C-E, not T-E).

Received on Friday, 11 April 2014 19:12:04 UTC