- From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:19:20 +1000
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 11 April 2014 00:19:51 UTC
I'm happy to explore other avenues. I'm also happy to defer the discussion until HTTP/3. I still believe there's a significant case that HTTP/2 doesn't address, that HTTP/1.1 (theoretically) does: allowing compression after entity-specific operations (such as ranges). If T-E is not the right way, I would want to discuss other mechanisms; and since those would likely modify HTTP semantics, not to mention requiring lengthy debate, it should wait for HTTP/3. Others may have a stronger opinion about the importance of T-E in HTTP/2. Cheers -- Matthew Kerwin http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
Received on Friday, 11 April 2014 00:19:51 UTC