- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 17:02:16 -0700
- To: Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: Daniel Sommermann <dcsommer@fb.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 10 April 2014 16:50, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll note that REFUSED_STREAM doesn't actually solve the problem entirely, > since it does require the user (not just the proxy) to retry. Indeed. But each hop is given that choice (retry this request, or fail back to my client). > It is hoped that alt-svc (potentially to the same name) will give us the > ability to have the client (proxy or not) reconnect to a new server (and > thus there should be no need for a LAME_DUCK given that mechanism). I don't think that helps Daniel's case, just the more general one.
Received on Friday, 11 April 2014 00:02:43 UTC