- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 13:31:25 -0700
- To: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
- Cc: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 4 April 2014 12:14, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com> wrote: > My $0.02: Since "Transfer-Encoding: gzip" would apply to both HTTP/1.1 and > HTTP/2, we should define gzip in a separate document that applies to both. > That would also allow for some needed security discussions in order to make > the necessary conformance statements. ? Transfer-Encoding: gzip is defined for HTTP/1.1 already. HTTP/2 doesn't permit hop-by-hop headers, so it cannot be defined in a way that would be applicable to both.
Received on Friday, 4 April 2014 20:31:52 UTC