W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: #445: Transfer-codings

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 13:31:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUsPwLxXq415+skY4Mz2o6Xid0q0km+1i54UYktWkyw3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
Cc: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 4 April 2014 12:14, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com> wrote:
> My $0.02: Since "Transfer-Encoding: gzip" would apply to both HTTP/1.1 and
> HTTP/2, we should define gzip in a separate document that applies to both.
> That would also allow for some needed security discussions in order to make
> the necessary conformance statements.

?

Transfer-Encoding: gzip is defined for HTTP/1.1 already.

HTTP/2 doesn't permit hop-by-hop headers, so it cannot be defined in a
way that would be applicable to both.
Received on Friday, 4 April 2014 20:31:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:29 UTC