- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 13:23:10 -0700
- To: K.Morgan@iaea.org
- Cc: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>, Martin Nilsson <nilsson@opera.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>, C.Brunhuber@iaea.org, James Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Frédéric Kayser <f.kayser@free.fr>
On 4 April 2014 11:41, <K.Morgan@iaea.org> wrote: > The proposals by Matthew and Mark get the job done, but they strike us as > more complex than TE/Transfer-Encoding... I don't agree. Both are considerably simpler. Aside from TE: Trailers (which is basically information free in my opinion), we've removed hop-by-hop headers from HTTP/2. I don't think that re-introducing them would be a good idea.
Received on Friday, 4 April 2014 20:23:38 UTC