W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: #445: Transfer-codings

From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 03:50:17 +1000
Message-ID: <CACweHNBc8Z0wTNwiKb_F8GczBONgAkbRvhHL1_dB=W2eY2Gqgg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Apr 4, 2014 4:46 PM, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 3 April 2014 22:21, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote:
> >
> > Does that not count as an implementation detail?
>
> That's not the point.  The point is that an endpoint needs to be able
> to limit the state commitment it makes.  Based on this, the commitment
> could be as much as 256K for these settings.

Or as little as zero. Or, if they do support gzip, nothing stops them
interpreting any >0 rank as 1, and remembering 1 bit per thingy. I don't
understand what you're getting at.
Received on Friday, 4 April 2014 17:50:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:29 UTC