Re: #421: Mixed Schemes

On 2 April 2014 10:29, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:
>> BTW, hiding this critical text in the introduction of part 1 was
>> canny.  I went looking in a lot of places, but didn't think to look
>> there.
>
> Yeah, well ... I think at one point we were planning to have a more
> extensive description of all the wonderful things a proxy can do,
> but we ended up just defining the purpose of each field instead.

Which is adequate, if not ideal.  Honestly, if you were to
exhaustively enumerate what was possible, a -bis in 7 years would turn
into 70.

Maybe I should read the introductory section again.

Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2014 17:39:46 UTC