W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: TLS Renegotiation and HTTP/2 (#363)

From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 11:46:55 +0200
Message-ID: <3215b8fbf0014e15a5f49d0cd003e008.squirrel@arekh.dyndns.org>
To: "Yoav Nir" <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Ilari Liusvaara" <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Le Mar 1 avril 2014 19:41, Yoav Nir a écrit :
>
> On Apr 1, 2014, at 8:18 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 1 April 2014 07:21, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> But you’ve convinced me - we should add the channel bindings to the
>>> signed data.
>>
>> This looks quite similar to the CREDENTIAL frame when you do it that
>> way.
>
> Sure. In general, HTTP authentication schemes are not tied to a
> connection.

Except when they are authenticating a connexion via a particuliar
intermediary…

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2014 09:47:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:29 UTC