- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 20:51:36 -0700
- To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 31 March 2014 20:08, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote: > This is not "mis-advertising". The origin server producing the response > eminently *does* support that service. > > I then draw your attention to draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-00 section 3... > > " Intermediaries MUST NOT change or append Alt-Svc values. " > > There is no distinction regarding intermediary type(s), nor exemption > clauses. CDN is an intermediary just as much as any other. That would be fine, except for the fact that - in this case - it seems likely that the CDN is acting as an origin server that serves a copy of the content, not an intermediary. The URI includes the domain name of the CDN. Will, amirite?
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2014 03:52:05 UTC