W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Expect: + Upgrade: = ...

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 12:05:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV-aM09ARacMS4pb-8pu-xi89c_12SbCBPikN3K0vUq4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
Cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 6 September 2013 11:52, Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> wrote:
> So if server sends 101 and then 100, one direction of connection is
> HTTP/1.1 and the other is HTTP/2.0 until the request is completed?

Presumably, yes.  But we shouldn't allow that.

> Does the HTTP/2.0 flow control apply? :->

Of course not.  The client is speaking 1.1.
Received on Friday, 6 September 2013 19:06:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:15 UTC