Re: More header compression comments

On 5 September 2013 02:56, Gábor Molnár <gabor.molnar@sch.bme.hu> wrote:
>> [b] There's only one place where 0-based indexing is used, and that is
>> for index toggling.  I have a suggestion for that too.
>>
>> Rather than have an opcode for the reference set toggling, simply
>> start the encoding of a header block with a 0-terminated list of
>> header table indexes to toggle.  Then you can reclaim a bit from the
>> front of the other opcodes.
>
> This would be in conflict with one of the main advantages of the
> current design: it would require a two-pass encoder

Good point.  Scratch that then.

Received on Thursday, 5 September 2013 17:37:27 UTC