Re: Translating CR LF to HTTP/1 headers

On 4 September 2013 09:20, Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for the clarification. How about clearly state that U+000D and
> U+000A in header field must be replaced with U+0020 in that section? It will
> spare the time for the readers to go around and check obs-fold production.

httpbis already has great text on this.  This is really just a pointer
to the decision in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-23#section-3.2.4

A reference to that makes sense, see b5dda02.

Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 16:40:05 UTC