- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2013 11:07:00 -0700
- To: William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>
- Cc: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 31 August 2013 23:28, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org> wrote: > Yeah, I didn't really know how to spec that. Basically, the DATA frames form > the bidirectional tunnel. Then that's what you say :) > I'm not quite sure what else to say here, [...] The only thing that probably needs looking into is the effect that tunneling has on what the TLS layer will probably treat like TCP. That is, note how this potentially differs from TCP. Frame sizes can be dealt with easily enough, but you also need to consider how it closes. Maybe this leads to a requirement to treat END_STREAM like FIN (just as RST_STREAM is analogous to RST).
Received on Sunday, 1 September 2013 18:07:27 UTC