W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Mandatory encryption *is* theater

From: (wrong string) 陈智昌 <willchan@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:38:03 +0800
Message-ID: <CAA4WUYgn5jgTojch=Z7Kv=BONLzrwtyyjkuhHCkZ_FgnKE231Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote:

> In message <CAA4WUYjOzPQUxy97WuQSFS0XMw3meXt87eRXZi=
> s_xAkBU+XfA@mail.gmail.com>, =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuIC
> jpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= writes:
>
> >I agree authentication would be nice to have,
> >but I think it's unfair to criticize mandatory to offer *encryption*
> >because of authentication.
>
> When you say "encryption", do you mean "privacy" ?
>

I mean encryption, because that's AIUI what mnot hinted at in his Berlin
presentation.


>
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2013 09:38:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:15 UTC