- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:02:34 +0200
- To: "Roberto Peon" <grmocg@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Salvatore Loreto" <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Le Dim 25 août 2013 22:18, Roberto Peon a écrit : > We've seen that the network delays bytes on some ports because (we assume) > of inspecting proxies, even when the data is incomprehensible to the > proxy. > If the bytes are merely signed then the bytes are visible and modification > is still performed-- the modification becomes time-domain, e.g. > dropping/delaying packets, etc. > > In any case, if you're doing the work of signing, why not just encrypt? Because when the stream is not security-sensitive, it's the difference between intermediaries wasting resources trying to determine if the download if safe vie indirect means or passing it up directly -- Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Monday, 26 August 2013 09:03:02 UTC