- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:19:42 -0700
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 23 August 2013 22:20:09 UTC
The opaque type does not have an existing standard analog in http/1, the translation path is to simply base64 encode those. On Aug 23, 2013 3:11 PM, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23 August 2013 14:58, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > > But that makes translation to http/1 harder. You'd have to know in > advance > > that any given header is a http-date or number. > > At the point you move to typed headers, I think that you need to > accept this possibility. Solving the problem for dates specifically > still leaves the opaque type. >
Received on Friday, 23 August 2013 22:20:09 UTC