- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:48:40 -0700
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Received on Friday, 23 August 2013 21:49:07 UTC
I went with this so we could reserve a few additional types but I'm not that particular about it. Whichever works. On Aug 23, 2013 2:46 PM, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23 August 2013 09:00, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > > 1. UTF-8 > > 2. Legacy > > 3. Opaque > > 4. Integer > > 5. Timestamp > > > With only 5 values, you could regain 1 bit on three of those values, > or 2 bits on one. > > 0, 100, 101, 110, 111 or 00, 01, 10, 110, 111 > > The first option might work well if you think that Legacy is going to > be very common. Otherwise you could split UTF-8/Legacy/Opaque three > ways. >
Received on Friday, 23 August 2013 21:49:07 UTC