Re: END_PUSH_PROMISE

On 21 August 2013 13:46, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> wrote:
> If this were ages
> ago in time, I'd vote for 0x1 as the common bit, but that seems likely
> to be more disruptive than useful.

Understood.  As it stands, we have something of a hierarchy of END
bits: stream, message, frame.  Noting of course that END_MESSAGE is
just a placeholder for the moment.

Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2013 20:54:49 UTC