W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: END_PUSH_PROMISE

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:54:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVGixHzuFFF0LERpFnSTG8me5gB3u+STdT9RTLbC9MO-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 21 August 2013 13:46, David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> wrote:
> If this were ages
> ago in time, I'd vote for 0x1 as the common bit, but that seems likely
> to be more disruptive than useful.

Understood.  As it stands, we have something of a hierarchy of END
bits: stream, message, frame.  Noting of course that END_MESSAGE is
just a placeholder for the moment.
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2013 20:54:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:14 UTC